Social Darwinism Versus Reform Darwinism
How did Social Darwinism differ from Reform Darwinism?
ASocial Darwinists were predominantly Catholic, whereas Reform Darwinists were predominantly Protestant.
BSocial Darwinists maintained that the wealthy were naturally more fit than the poor, whereas Reform Darwinists argued that the wealthy had a moral obligation to assist the less fit and impoverished.
CSocial Darwinists argued that native-born Americans were inherently more fit, whereas Reform Darwinists believed that immigrants could eventually become the dominant group.
DSocial Darwinists believed that wealth was a permanent condition, whereas Reform Darwinists argued that the impoverished could eventually acquire wealth.
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.