Past Consideration and Contract Validity
Mabel asked Sally for a ride to the mall, and Sally obliged. Upon returning, Mabel promised to take Sally to lunch the following day to thank her for the ride. When Sally arrived the next day, Mabel refused to take her to lunch. Which of the following describes the most likely legal outcome?
A
Sally is not entitled to lunch because driving Mabel was a moral obligation.
B
Mabel is legally required to compensate Sally for the ride to the mall.
C
A binding agreement was formed, and Mabel must honor her promise to provide lunch.
D
A valid contract was not formed because the promise was based on past consideration.
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.