Doctrine Of Laches In Contract Performance
Kilwin sought to have his house painted and received a quote from Murphy. After Kilwin accepted the quote, the parties signed a contract. However, Murphy failed to begin the work by the date specified in the agreement. A week later, Kilwin contracted with another painter.
Does Murphy have a valid legal claim against Kilwin?
A
Yes, because Murphy was willing to perform the work, even though over-scheduling indicates mismanagement.
B
Yes, because Kilwin initiated the agreement and contract performance is not subject to time limits.
C
No, because the doctrine of laches may apply due to Murphy's unnecessary delay in performing the agreed-upon work.
D
Yes, because a valid contract existed between Murphy and Kilwin.
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.