Intentional Tort Of Battery
Biggs was walking his dog when he encountered another man and demanded his money. When the man refused, Biggs commanded the dog to bite him. The dog bit the man's arm, causing severe wounds. Under tort law, which of the following accurately describes this situation?
ABiggs committed battery against the man, even though the physical contact was made by the dog.
BBiggs is not liable because the dog directly caused the physical harm.
CBiggs cannot be held legally responsible for the actions of his dog.
DBiggs lacked the requisite intent to commit a tort because the dog might not have followed the command.
Question Leaderboard
Not enough data yet to show leaderboard.